They advocate progressive enhancement-building a website that works satisfactorily in all current browsers and then adding features to improve the experience for visitors using more advanced browsers. In more recent times, leading designers have turned this idea on its head, arguing that you shouldn’t need to wait for the majority of browsers to implement a feature before using it. If a feature couldn’t be supported by a particular browser-usually Netscape 4-a fallback solution prevented the design from breaking completely. A more enlightened approach known as graceful degradation emerged with the web standards movement in the first decade of the new century. But if you weren’t using IE-and many weren’t-it was still your hard luck. When IE eventually emerged as the victor in the browser wars, many designers breathed a sigh of relief and designed exclusively for IE. If you weren’t using the recommended browser, that was just your hard luck. Designers often gave up trying to reconcile incompatible differences between Internet Explorer (IE) and Netscape. When we treat them as if they were what they should be, we improve them as far as they can be improved.īack in the 1990s, it was common for the front page of a website to inform visitors that it was “best viewed” in a particular browser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |